Free Malaysia Today (http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com)
(1) Mahathir’s policies, Malaysia’s loss, 11 October 2013
by Mariam Mokhtar
His politicisation of the education system with its lack of meritocracy has crippled two generations of Malaysians and god forbid if he succeeds in pushing his son to continue his legacy
The haughty Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia’s longest serving prime minister, will never express regret. Mahathir made a mess of Malaysia and now he acts the innocent. He played on the insecurities of the Malays to build his empire – political and financial – within a warped framework of “unity”.
Whatever has gone wrong with Malaysia, the solution is not more Mahathirism. Look where it got us and look at what this nation will become if Mahathir succeeds in pushing his son, Mukhriz into pole position.
The closest Mahathir came to admit that his policies had failed Malaysians, was on Sept 12, at the 30th anniversary luncheon of the Japanese Chambers of Trade and Industry Malaysia (Jactim). He said that the use of English, especially in science and mathematics, would help improve the standing of Malaysian public universities on the world stage.
When asked for his views about the Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025, his curt reply indicated his displeasure at the omission of English in schools.
“Melayu mudah lupa”, for it was Mahathir in his role as the Minister of Education in the 70s, who effectively wiped English off the slate, in schools. Mahathir dismantled a century of British effort to provide education, and demolished the work of two centuries of dedicated mission school pioneers.
On Oct 7, Mahathir again expressed his concern at the lack of proficiency in English displayed by students, when he complained about the quality of graduates, who presented themselves for job interviews. In one case, he claimed that only seven out of the 333 potential job applicants in information technology, were suitable. The unsuccessful graduates did not know English and had asked for the interview to be conducted in Malay.
“Melayu mudah lupa” and it is disingenuous of Mahathir to feign ignorance, because he tinkered with the education system, as Minister for Education and later, as prime minister. Malaysian parents from the 70s onwards, have been on a roller-coaster ride with their children’s education, which flopped between English and Malay, several times.
The 70s saw a decline of English medium schools. A decade later, it was the turn of the higher institutions of learning to suffer. Non-Malay lecturers saw their services, and their publications, being sidelined. Simultaneously, the civil service, the armed forces and the judiciary, absorbed many Malays and promoted them, in preference to the other races.
Today, Malaysia reaps what Mahathir has sown. With the emphasis on Malay, Malays are reluctant to speak English with some claiming that it is unpatriotic to speak anything but Malay. The irony is that these Malays complain about the difficulty of getting jobs in the private sector, or with multinational companies.
A child in a MARA residential college told this writer that if he were to speak English, to practise the language, he would be teased and bullied for showing off and wanting to be “Mat Salleh”. When overseas, a majority of the Malay students, diplomatic staff and government officials speak halting English. Many have difficulty making themselves understood.
Mahathir kept Malays frightened and demoralised
In Mahathir’s ‘Look east’ campaign, he claimed to like the Japanese work culture but ignored the Chinese work ethic. Why? If he had promoted the use of Mandarin alongside Malay, all Malaysian school children would have greater exposure to business and educational opportunities in the east, especially as the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now a super power.
Mahathir did not care about the consequences of politicising education, despite the reservations of parents, pupils, teachers and schools. All he cared about was to be declared the “saviour of the Malays”. The man who claimed to have a vision for Malaysia, displayed a naïve, parochial view of the world.
Although more Malays enter higher education, their degrees are dumbed-down, because the pass marks are lowered for them. Despite the introduction of quotas, élite Malays abuse the system and deny their poorer countrymen the opportunities which were meant for them. Five decades ago, the Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka invited engineers and scientists to expand the Malay language, with suitable scientific terms.
Today, we see a bastardisation of the Malay language, not just in science and technology, with suffixes like “ogi” or “asi” being appended to many English words, in a lazy manner.
Mahathir’s politicisation of the education system with its lack of meritocracy, has crippled at least two generations of Malaysians. The brightest students whom we rejected, became Singapore’s gain.
Mahathir may have wanted to help the bulk of the Malays, but his policy of making everyone slow down, to the point of standstill, so the Malays could catch up, was detrimental to the nation. His policy should have been to provide assistance to all needy students, regardless of race or religion, to raise them to an acceptable standard.
If Malaysia is in a mess today, blame the BN politicians (Umno-Baru, MIC, MCA, Gerakan) who did not unite and stand up to Mahathir. We know that opposition politicians who criticised Mahathir, were jailed.
Yesterday, Mahathir said that the ministers, whose failed departments were highlighted in the latest Auditor-General’s report, should resign for incompetence. It is ironic that during his tenure, he defended the failures of his ministers, despite these failures being highlighted in the annual Auditor-General’s reports. Furthermore, he dismissed reports of his own deficiencies.
No one should be fooled by Mahathir’s latest call for ministers to resign. He is not concerned about the quality of Umno-Baru ministers, he is only weeding out the candidates who stand in the way of Mukhriz.
In his book on Mahathir, Barry Wain describes the pain felt by the young Mahathir, on being discriminated by the Malay community in his native Alor Setar. It is possible that Mahathir expressed his loathing for the Malays by using them to gain power, whilst at the same time giving the Malays the perception that they were privileged.
Mahathir kept his hold on the Malays by deliberately keeping them frightened and demoralised.
He did this by constantly harping on May 13 and racial violence. He told the Malays that they would not survive if they did not have the NEP and other government incentives. He gave them an inferior education because he knew that a confident and well-educated nation is more difficult to govern.
Mahathir made the Malays feel helpless so that they would think he was their saviour. The greatest tragedy would be if Mahathir managed to promote his son, Mukhriz, to continue, where he left off.
・Mariam Mokhtar is a FMT columnist
(2)All are ‘pendatang’ religions in Malaysia, 12 May 2014
FMT LETTER: From Ravinder Singh, via e-mail
Of late Isma and its ilk, for God knows on what mission, have started bashing the ‘kafir-pendatangs’ so relentlessly while bragging about the supremacy of the Malay-Muslims that it has irked even Dr Mahathir into rebuking it to shut up.
I wonder if all those who are championing the supremacy of the Malay-Muslims and condemning the so-called ‘kafir-pendatangs’ and accusing the latter of having intruded into this country, of having taken away the wealth of the Malay-Muslims, of being ungrateful to the Malay-Muslims for having accommodated them for so-long, of insinuating that they are not paying taxes, etc. etc., have ever pondered on one hard fact about religions in Malaysia, i.e. are they aware that all religions we find in this country, including the official religion of Islam, are in their own right, and excuse me for so saying, ‘pendatang’ religions?
The non-Malay non-Muslims (by right should be the non-orang asli) who were born in this country, regardless of their religions, who know only this country as the land of “tanah tumpah darah ku”, who have lived and toiled here all their lives to help develop the cpountry, are not, and cannot by any stretch of the imagination be termed as ‘pendatangs’. Their fore-fore-fore-fathers did come from other lands ages go, but they are long gone.
This ugly term ‘pendatang’ was popularised by Mahathir in his book ‘The Malay Dilemma’, forgetting that he himself is a descendant of someone who had come from India fairly recently compared to other ‘pendatangs’ who had come centuries ago. I wonder if he is regretting using this term?
Very similarly, Islam and the other religions in Malaysia were not born in Malaya or Malaysia. They were all brought here. So they were all ‘di-datangkan’ to this country. Would it therefore be wrong to say that Islam and all the other religions in Malaysia are ‘pendatang’ religions?
If Islam itself is a ‘pendatang’ religion (I mean no disrespect to the religion which I hold in high esteem, and am using this term for the sake of a heart-to-heart discussion), then is it fair for the followers of Islam to condemn the followers of the other ‘pendatang’ religions?
Isma’s issue and that of its ilk’s is not about people being of Chinese, Indian, or of any other ethnic descent, but whether they are Muslim or otherwise. In the myopic vision of Isma, they can be of any ethnic descent, but so long as they are Muslim (even if recent converts) they are one with Isma. Otherwise they must be chased out of Malaysia.
Isma, please give a logical reason why it is the right of the descendants of those ‘pendatangs’ who had adopted Islam as their faith, to condemn the descendants of other ‘pendatangs’ who did not adopt the same faith? Is it simply because the former outnumber the latter? Might is right? Or did God give you this right?
Was the Prophet so intolerant of those of other faiths? Did he condemn and drive them out of his land? Isma talks as if God only created the Muslims. Then where did the non-Muslims come from onto this earth?
(End)
